Comments on: Carving Up GIS StackExchange

By: Bill Dollins

Bill Dollins — Fri, 21 Sep 2012 10:58:53 +0000

Thanks, everyone. It was fun to play around with the API and see what people were talking about on GIS SE. We have a vibrant community and GIS SE makes that very clear!

By: Donny V.

Donny V. — Wed, 19 Sep 2012 20:06:13 +0000

Light years ahead!

By: CaptDragon

CaptDragon — Tue, 18 Sep 2012 13:48:31 +0000

100% correct!

By: ragi

ragi — Tue, 18 Sep 2012 01:20:29 +0000

Hahahaha you are right

By: mattwilkie

mattwilkie — Mon, 17 Sep 2012 23:18:10 +0000

Thank you Bill. it’s good to have a graphic and some numbers to bolster — and correct — my internal idea of how the questions come down. It's more evenly balanced than I thought. I like that, a great deal.

@Stephen, GIS.se is certainly my preference to Esri.com for asking questions that get answered. There's a whole heck of a lot going on over there that we don't really see though, and that's ok. I wouldn't like to GIS.se become top-heavy in any single platform, or have things split into esri.gis.stackexchange.com and quantum.gis.stackexchange. I thrive on the interchange. :)

By: Stephen Lead

Stephen Lead — Mon, 17 Sep 2012 22:37:13 +0000

Evidently, GIS StackExchange is a better Esri forum than the Esri forums....

By: RyanDalton

RyanDalton — Mon, 17 Sep 2012 16:56:16 +0000

It is really great to see such a wide variety of topics that we discuss. The only category I would want to add would be "web mapping", which seems to have a lot of activity on GIS.SE.

By: Sam007

Sam007 — Mon, 17 Sep 2012 16:04:37 +0000

This is indeed very insightful. Thanks and a great job.